Game Five: 2004 Auburn Tigers (13-0) vs 1994 Florida Gators (10-2-1)
Tale of the tape:
'04 Auburn Tigers:
Points Per Game: 32
Points Allowed Per Game: 11
Avg. Margin of Victory: 21
Key wins: #16 LSU, #13 Tennessee (Twice), #7 Georgia, #10 Virginia Tech
Losses: None
'94 Florida Gators:
Points Per Game: 41
Points Allowed Per Game: 18
Avg. Margin of Victory: 32
Key wins: #4 Alabama, #22 Tennessee
Losses: #9 Auburn, #4 Florida St
Argument for Auburn:
In a word, balance. The offense could score, the defense could hit. Like the '98 Vols, both sides of the ball were just loaded with NFL talent. The offense was led by Jason Campbell at QB who had an outstanding Senior year. Tailbacks Caddillac Williams and Ronnie Brown shared rushing duties, with Williams going over 1,200 yards ...more
 | by SECFans -- June 24, 2009 10:36 PM
|
Comments: 0 | Views: 1154
Mythical Former SEC Champion Playoffs
Mythical playoffs are all the rage these days. Everyone loves speculating over 8 or 16 team end-of-year playoffs to determine the NCAA football champion. At SECFans.com, we like playoffs too. What better way to fill the downtime of the off-season than to speculate over a dream backyard brawl of former SEC Championship game winners? That's right, over the next few days we are going to see what could happen if these SEC champs went toe-to-toe.
Here's some details. We seeded from #1-4, giving preference to final record, ranking, and strength of schedule. The 4 undefeated champions naturally got the four available #1 seeds. Next, we seeded the #4's. Before the #4's were seeded, however, we had to bring the field down to 16 (there have been 17 SEC winners of SEC Championship games). Sorry LSU fans, the '01 squad just didn’t make the cut. There have been multiple 3 loss SEC Champions since 1992, and one had to go. Unfortunately for '01 LSU, their strength of schedule ranking was 23rd that year. '99 Alabama and '00 Florida both had the #1 ranked SOS in their respective ...more
 | by SECFans -- June 23, 2009 7:25 PM
|
Comments: 4 | Views: 3076
A Rejoinder to my Kool-Aid Drinking Buddy, BamaGrad
In reading Bamagrad03's article, "Chizik Is Well-Intentioned, Headed For The Wrong Result", I the word "ironic" came to mind. Because in the midst of calling Auburn fans out on blind homerism, he utterly misses his own blinders. No, not the ones he admitted to regarding Shula. The ones that not only limit how you view your own team, but how you also view your archrival. And that's where he's wrong. Here's why:
While I agree that fans are almost
always going to give their guy the benefit of the doubt, I think
there's more to it than you're allowing for and I think you're just
plain wrong on a couple of things.
1. I think the support Chizik has now
was not an instantaneous thing but has come as the result of what
he's done in his short time at the ...more
 | by TitanTiger -- June 1, 2009 9:41 PM
|
Comments: 3 | Views: 250
An Auburn Fan's Thoughts on Chizik

I cannot imagine the words that Jay Jacobs could string together that would convince an intelligent, rational thinking Auburn fan that hiring a coach with a 5-19 record as a head coach is a good move. I guess I can imagine some of the things he might try to pass off as sound reasons. In the end, it was just a very poor public relations move.
On December 15, 2008 I made a call to Jay Jacobs’ office. I suspect phones all over the athletic complex were ringing off the hook that morning, along with some in the president's office, a couple at Colonial Bank down the road in Montgomery, and maybe even Yella Fella's. I, to my displeasure, was made aware in short order that nobody in ...more
 | by JR4AU -- May 28, 2009 4:51 PM
|
Comments: 0 | Views: 338
Chizik Is Well Intentioned, Headed for Wrong Result
Ask anyone who spent time in Aimes, Iowa the last couple years and they'll tell you: "Thank God Auburn took Chizik off our hands." So why are Auburn fans overjoyed to have this guy leading the charge? It's simple. Fans are always going to go out of their way to give their guy the benefit of the doubt.
I was guilty. I drank the Mike Shula kool-aid. He was a likeable guy, and even his opponents wanted to see him do well. I spun until I could spin no longer. Unfortunately for Auburn fans, they're in the same boat. Certainly, Tiger fans are drawing on Gene's history as a top notch defensive co-ordinator. Funny how AU fans were quick to give Tommy Tuberville all the credit in those days. The constant defenders of CTT's honor, they'd fight to the death to keep his name out of the "CEO coach" realm. But now? Now they'll tell you it was all Chizik. Because Tommy is long gone.
Ask an Auburn fan, and they'll be quick to laud his efforts as a defensive guru at both Auburn and Texas. They'll talk about how any coach inheriting the mess Gene encountered in Aimes would be destined for failure. What they don't ...more
 | by Bamagrad03 -- May 26, 2009 11:05 PM
|
Comments: 4 | Views: 422
An Inside Look at Gus Malzahn's Offense
A small dose of X's and O's.
The "Smash" is a standard passing "concept". Almost every playbook will include some version of it. I recently bought Gus Malzahn's book, THE HURRY-UP, NO HUDDLE: AN OFFENSIVE PHILOSOPHY, and it's the first passing concept he covers in the book. Remember Malzahn's offense isn't about gimmicky plays. His plays are the same stuff most everybody else is doing. It's his tempo that is the "revolutionary" part. I'll discuss the tempo in a later blog.
When you hear "smash route" it really refers to a route combination. The wide receiver will run a hitch route at 5-6 yards. The Tight End or slot receiver to that same side will run a 12 yard corner route. That is he will go vertical for 12 yards then break at about a 45 degree angle to the sideline. Some may refer to this as a "Flag Route". This route combination is a designed "Cover 2 beater" but works against other coverages as well. The idea is to vertically stretch the outer third of the field with a High/Low concept. This is a standard tactic and can be accomplished with many route combinations. The Smash is just one. Here are some example ...more
 | by JR4AU -- May 26, 2009 2:55 PM
|
Comments: 2 | Views: 1734
Auburn's Offensive Line Depth Issues

Is eight enough? Let's see.
I've been discussing Auburn's offensive line depth issues lately with some people. Many are convinced there is no way we can go through a season with "eight offensive linemen that can play". Some have even suggested we're woefully short by a wide margin, and that most SEC teams have 12-15 linemen ready to play or start now.
Let's first address Auburn's starting five. I don't guess you can totally discount the 2008 performance on the offensive line, but you have to account for the internal strife that was happening. LT Lee Ziemba was a Freshman All SEC selection in 2007. I don't think he suddenly lost the talent we saw as a raw freshman. Ditto Ryan Pugh. Left Tackle and Center are key positions, and both have 2 varsity letters. Then there's Senior right tackle Andrew McCain. He was a tight end coming out of high school that "outgrew the position." He's never started a game on the offensive line, but has three varsity letters. Finally there are ...more
 | by JR4AU -- May 23, 2009 11:59 AM
|
Comments: 5 | Views: 325